Table 4.1 - Pre-set four-team round-robin
1 2 3
- - -
1 - 3 2 4 1 v 3 2 v 4
2 - 4 1 3 1 v 2 3 v 4
3 - 1 4 2 1 v 4 2 v 3
4 - 2 3 1
If the top two teams are advancing you probably want to have the 2-3 game
last, since that is the most important game. If you are trying to choose a
winner, or the top team out of the four-team pool, the 1-2 game should be
scheduled last.
4.2. The flexible four-team round-robin
Who plays who in the first round should be dependant upon whether 2nd place
"matters" or not. For example, if, say, all you are choosing is a winner,
or, all four teams are advancing and all you are accomplishing with the
round-robin is seeding for the four teams, you might schedule 1-4 and 2-3
for the first round. However, suppose the top two teams advance. In that
case 2-3 is a very important game, and it would be better not to schedule
it for the first round. A first round of 1-3 and 2-4 would be
preferable. If, say, second place is crucial for some reason or another,
you would want to play 1-3 and 2-4 the first round, and have the two
winners each play each other the seond round. In that way, one of the
third round games may be "the game" for second place.
Table 4.2.1. Flexible four-team round-robin; 1 and 4 play first
Table 4.2.2. Flexible four-team round-robin; 1 and 3 play first
1 -----
A -----_
4 ----- _
C _ -----
2 ----- _ first place
B -----
3 -----
Table 4.4. Modified four-team double elimination
This format is very exciting if second place matters. Alone, it doesn't
offer much. A team that loses two games is finished. But it has its place
if used as the second day of a tournament where you have eliminated down to
four teams the day earlier.
1 ----- LA -----
A -----_ D -----_
4 ----- _ LB ----- E _ ------
C _ ----- _ second place
2 ----- _ first place LC -----
B -----
3 ----- loser of game E is third place